Peter Bengtsson 30 March Reply Good idea! For example running both on a 3. In other words, I want to have a function I call in some applications and not in others and I want my tooling to remove the function when it is not required. UglifyJS can remove unused functions. I also suggest putting the same variable columns next to each other so it's easier to compare Closure and UglifyJS, e. Jos van den Oever 22 January Reply To me the point of closure compiler is that it does a lot of sanity checks. I ran this for 90 found files Is my conclusion incorrect? However, the downside is that it also was the slowest of the three methods by a significant margin this was executed on an AWS EC2 instance of size t2. I am currently reevaluating our tooling.
It concluded that Closure Compiler compressed files down to % of the original size.
Comparing uglifyjs and googleclosurecompiler Show and Tell Elm
Advanced Closure Compiler vs UglifyJS2
However, Closure still does a better job than Uglify and other minifiers are generic and won't break code (unless you enable the advanced.
But I may not have looked close enough because Item 3 is the deal breaker for me unless I am missing something. It's rare that the speed matters all that much because it's usually done in a build step that is done once only on deployment or something such but having to mess around with Java is really not worth it when Node is so pervasive and almost always available.
Uglify is only a compressor but CC is far beyond that so it's obviously going to be much slower. What do you think? This topic was automatically closed 10 days after the last reply.
Uglifyjs vs closure advanced systemcare
|In Summary First of all, can I just say that due to Closure Compiler being written in Java, my poor Macbook Pro's fan had to sweat and blow so hard I thought it was going to melt through the desk.
Same file run through Uglify takes 7. I wonder if that option was or wasn't used in this blog post.
Video: Uglifyjs vs closure advanced systemcare Is Advanced SystemCare a Rogue? - A-V Test #33
Nice test! Pawel 10 October Reply You missed the point with this comparison because Closure Compiler is an advanced optimiser.
companyzip, compaq, compaqhttpserver, compare, comparebase, compared, systematically, systembackup, systemcare, systemcastwizard, systemcheck. automatic · automaticapi · automating-catia-v5-or-dmu-navigator-with-python closure-depresolver · closure-linter · closure- gears-uglifyjs · gearshift i8ooadvanced-system-care-antivirus-customer-helpdesk-phone- number.
Feels strange that a tool is a type checker and a compressor at the same time.
It's rare that the speed matters all that much because it's usually done in a build step that is done once only on deployment or something such but having to mess around with Java is really not worth it when Node is so pervasive and almost always available. Using elm make --optimize and your configurations exactly, I tested it with elm-spa-examplewhich of course is the benchmark Evan is using in his post.
Home Archive About Contact Search. The results are almost identical.